brainsteam.co.uk/brainsteam/content/annotations/2022/11/27/1669556048.md

63 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

---
date: '2022-11-27T13:34:08'
hypothesis-meta:
created: '2022-11-27T13:34:08.086172+00:00'
document:
title:
- OP-SCIP190035 895..905
flagged: false
group: __world__
hidden: false
id: K04A5G5YEe2Wv4uzp_WNKQ
links:
html: https://hypothes.is/a/K04A5G5YEe2Wv4uzp_WNKQ
incontext: https://hyp.is/K04A5G5YEe2Wv4uzp_WNKQ/viduketha.nsf.gov.lk:8585/FJDB_NSF/Science_and_Public_Policy/Vol.46(6)-2019/scz037.pdf
json: https://hypothes.is/api/annotations/K04A5G5YEe2Wv4uzp_WNKQ
permissions:
admin:
- acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
delete:
- acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
read:
- group:__world__
update:
- acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
tags:
- comprehensive impact
- researchers
target:
- selector:
- end: 3492
start: 3029
type: TextPositionSelector
- exact: ' increasing body of research analytically exploresthe consequences of
the research impact agenda on academic work,including the risks posed to research
quality (Chubb and Reed2018), prioritising of short-term impacts rather than
more concep-tual impacts (Greenhalgh and Fahy 2015; Meagher and Martin2017),
ethical risks (Smith and Stewart 2017), and a focus on indi-vidual academics
rather than on the broader context of research-based policy change (Dunlop
2018)'
prefix: ge production(Phillips 2010). An
suffix: .The sources of tension embedded
type: TextQuoteSelector
source: http://viduketha.nsf.gov.lk:8585/FJDB_NSF/Science_and_Public_Policy/Vol.46(6)-2019/scz037.pdf
text: Lots of papers write about the effect that the UK's focus on comprehensive
impact affects the quality of research and individual researchers
updated: '2022-11-27T13:34:08.086172+00:00'
uri: http://viduketha.nsf.gov.lk:8585/FJDB_NSF/Science_and_Public_Policy/Vol.46(6)-2019/scz037.pdf
user: acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
user_info:
display_name: James Ravenscroft
in-reply-to: http://viduketha.nsf.gov.lk:8585/FJDB_NSF/Science_and_Public_Policy/Vol.46(6)-2019/scz037.pdf
tags:
- comprehensive impact
- researchers
- hypothesis
type: annotation
url: /annotations/2022/11/27/1669556048
---
<blockquote> increasing body of research analytically exploresthe consequences of the research impact agenda on academic work,including the risks posed to research quality (Chubb and Reed2018), prioritising of short-term impacts rather than more concep-tual impacts (Greenhalgh and Fahy 2015; Meagher and Martin2017), ethical risks (Smith and Stewart 2017), and a focus on indi-vidual academics rather than on the broader context of research-based policy change (Dunlop 2018)</blockquote>Lots of papers write about the effect that the UK's focus on comprehensive impact affects the quality of research and individual researchers