60 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
60 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
|
---
|
||
|
date: '2022-11-27T13:23:58'
|
||
|
hypothesis-meta:
|
||
|
created: '2022-11-27T13:23:58.799954+00:00'
|
||
|
document:
|
||
|
title:
|
||
|
- Analysis_of_REF_impact.pdf
|
||
|
flagged: false
|
||
|
group: __world__
|
||
|
hidden: false
|
||
|
id: wCWRSG5WEe2stD8QQgklZw
|
||
|
links:
|
||
|
html: https://hypothes.is/a/wCWRSG5WEe2stD8QQgklZw
|
||
|
incontext: https://hyp.is/wCWRSG5WEe2stD8QQgklZw/webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20170712131025mp_/http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/HEFCE,2014/Content/Pubs/Independentresearch/2015/Analysis,of,REF,impact/Analysis_of_REF_impact.pdf
|
||
|
json: https://hypothes.is/api/annotations/wCWRSG5WEe2stD8QQgklZw
|
||
|
permissions:
|
||
|
admin:
|
||
|
- acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
|
||
|
delete:
|
||
|
- acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
|
||
|
read:
|
||
|
- group:__world__
|
||
|
update:
|
||
|
- acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
|
||
|
tags:
|
||
|
- research funders
|
||
|
- comprehensive impact
|
||
|
target:
|
||
|
- selector:
|
||
|
- end: 88026
|
||
|
start: 87757
|
||
|
type: TextPositionSelector
|
||
|
- exact: while there aregroups potentially benefiting from the case studies relating
|
||
|
to their field of research (egwriters benefiting from studies in Panel D,
|
||
|
engineers benefiting from studies in PanelB), there are mentions of these
|
||
|
potential beneficiaries across all the panels
|
||
|
prefix: 'is text-mining exercise is that '
|
||
|
suffix: '. Althoughthis would have to be '
|
||
|
type: TextQuoteSelector
|
||
|
source: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20170712131025mp_/http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/HEFCE,2014/Content/Pubs/Independentresearch/2015/Analysis,of,REF,impact/Analysis_of_REF_impact.pdf
|
||
|
text: The beneficiaries of research named by REF impact case studies are heterogeneous
|
||
|
across all UOAs
|
||
|
updated: '2022-11-27T13:23:58.799954+00:00'
|
||
|
uri: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20170712131025mp_/http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/HEFCE,2014/Content/Pubs/Independentresearch/2015/Analysis,of,REF,impact/Analysis_of_REF_impact.pdf
|
||
|
user: acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
|
||
|
user_info:
|
||
|
display_name: James Ravenscroft
|
||
|
in-reply-to: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20170712131025mp_/http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/HEFCE,2014/Content/Pubs/Independentresearch/2015/Analysis,of,REF,impact/Analysis_of_REF_impact.pdf
|
||
|
tags:
|
||
|
- research funders
|
||
|
- comprehensive impact
|
||
|
- hypothesis
|
||
|
type: annotation
|
||
|
url: /annotations/2022/11/27/1669555438
|
||
|
|
||
|
---
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
<blockquote>while there aregroups potentially benefiting from the case studies relating to their field of research (egwriters benefiting from studies in Panel D, engineers benefiting from studies in PanelB), there are mentions of these potential beneficiaries across all the panels</blockquote>The beneficiaries of research named by REF impact case studies are heterogeneous across all UOAs
|