60 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown
60 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown
|
---
|
||
|
|
date: '2022-11-27T12:46:13'
|
||
|
|
hypothesis-meta:
|
||
|
|
created: '2022-11-27T12:46:13.123111+00:00'
|
||
|
|
document:
|
||
|
|
title:
|
||
|
|
- 'Mapping the impact: Exploring the payback of arthritis research'
|
||
|
|
flagged: false
|
||
|
|
group: __world__
|
||
|
|
hidden: false
|
||
|
|
id: ebKibm5REe2ShxtULMIpFw
|
||
|
|
links:
|
||
|
|
html: https://hypothes.is/a/ebKibm5REe2ShxtULMIpFw
|
||
|
|
incontext: https://hyp.is/ebKibm5REe2ShxtULMIpFw/www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2009/RAND_MG862.pdf
|
||
|
|
json: https://hypothes.is/api/annotations/ebKibm5REe2ShxtULMIpFw
|
||
|
|
permissions:
|
||
|
|
admin:
|
||
|
|
- acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
|
||
|
|
delete:
|
||
|
|
- acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
|
||
|
|
read:
|
||
|
|
- group:__world__
|
||
|
|
update:
|
||
|
|
- acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
|
||
|
|
tags:
|
||
|
|
- scientometrics
|
||
|
|
- academic impact
|
||
|
|
target:
|
||
|
|
- selector:
|
||
|
|
- end: 46769
|
||
|
|
start: 46609
|
||
|
|
type: TextPositionSelector
|
||
|
|
- exact: Much broad and shallow evaluation is based onbibliometrics (examining
|
||
|
|
the quality of researchpublications) to assess the amount and quality ofknowledge
|
||
|
|
produced
|
||
|
|
prefix: ' from discovery to application).'
|
||
|
|
suffix: ". For example, David King\u2019sThe S"
|
||
|
|
type: TextQuoteSelector
|
||
|
|
source: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2009/RAND_MG862.pdf
|
||
|
|
text: here the authors are discussing the fact that a lot of analysis/evaluation
|
||
|
|
of research is done via bibliometrics (citation-based impact metrics) and they
|
||
|
|
consider this kind of evaluation to be "broad and shallow"
|
||
|
|
updated: '2022-11-27T12:46:13.123111+00:00'
|
||
|
|
uri: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2009/RAND_MG862.pdf
|
||
|
|
user: acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
|
||
|
|
user_info:
|
||
|
|
display_name: James Ravenscroft
|
||
|
|
in-reply-to: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2009/RAND_MG862.pdf
|
||
|
|
tags:
|
||
|
|
- scientometrics
|
||
|
|
- academic impact
|
||
|
|
- hypothesis
|
||
|
|
type: annotation
|
||
|
|
url: /annotations/2022/11/27/1669553173
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<blockquote>Much broad and shallow evaluation is based onbibliometrics (examining the quality of researchpublications) to assess the amount and quality ofknowledge produced</blockquote>here the authors are discussing the fact that a lot of analysis/evaluation of research is done via bibliometrics (citation-based impact metrics) and they consider this kind of evaluation to be "broad and shallow"
|