76 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
76 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
|
---
|
||
|
title: "Async Promise Constructors"
|
||
|
date: 2023-02-01T09:39:03Z
|
||
|
description: Why you shouldn't use async in your new Promise()
|
||
|
url: /2023/2/1/async-promise-constructors
|
||
|
type: post
|
||
|
mp-syndicate-to:
|
||
|
- https://brid.gy/publish/mastodon
|
||
|
- https://brid.gy/publish/twitter
|
||
|
tags:
|
||
|
- nodejs
|
||
|
- typescript
|
||
|
- javascript
|
||
|
- softeng
|
||
|
-
|
||
|
---
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
I ran into an interesting typescript/js problem yesterday at work.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The following code snippet was generating an error and a stack trace that was never being propagated up to the caller:
|
||
|
|
||
|
```typescript
|
||
|
return new Promise(async (resolve, reject) =>{
|
||
|
|
||
|
const data = await this.client.getObject(bucket, path)
|
||
|
|
||
|
const buf : any[] = []
|
||
|
|
||
|
data.on('data', (data) => {
|
||
|
buf.push(data)
|
||
|
})
|
||
|
|
||
|
data.on('error', (err) => {
|
||
|
reject(err)
|
||
|
})
|
||
|
|
||
|
data.on('end', ()=>{
|
||
|
resolve(JSON.parse(Buffer.concat(buf).toString()))
|
||
|
})
|
||
|
|
||
|
});
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
The code basically uses [minio](https://min.io/)'s client library to get the contents of an object in an S3 storage bucket and then wraps the stream that it returns in a promise that will eventually parse the content of the S3 object into a JS object or reject if something went wrong.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Seasoned js folks may have already spotted the problem (or at least guessed it based on the blog post title).
|
||
|
|
||
|
I'ved used an `async` function inside my Promise constructor. I'm doing this so that I can make my async call to S3 but this has the added side effect of turning my promise constructer itself into a promise (promise-ception?). Promise constructors can't `await` so effectively if the `getObject` async call fails, the error is lost and nothing happens and the outer promise is never resolved or rejected.
|
||
|
|
||
|
As it turns out, [eslint has a rule for this](https://eslint.org/docs/latest/rules/no-async-promise-executor) which I had turned off.
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Solution
|
||
|
|
||
|
I could make the getObject outer function async and then do the `getObject()` call in the outer layer:
|
||
|
|
||
|
```typescript
|
||
|
|
||
|
async function someFunction(){
|
||
|
|
||
|
const data = await this.client.getObject(bucket, path)
|
||
|
|
||
|
return new Promise((resolve, reject) =>{
|
||
|
const buf : any[] = []
|
||
|
|
||
|
data.on('data', (data) => { buf.push(data) })
|
||
|
data.on('error', (err) => { reject(err) })
|
||
|
data.on('end', ()=>{
|
||
|
resolve(JSON.parse(Buffer.concat(buf).toString()))
|
||
|
})
|
||
|
});
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
Now if the `getObject` call fails the whole `someFunction()` fails (effectively the promise that is generated by use of the await/async syntactic sugar is rejected).
|