diff --git a/brainsteam/content/annotations/2023/01/29/1674989603.md b/brainsteam/content/annotations/2023/01/29/1674989603.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b11f409
--- /dev/null
+++ b/brainsteam/content/annotations/2023/01/29/1674989603.md
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+---
+date: '2023-01-29T10:53:23'
+hypothesis-meta:
+  created: '2023-01-29T10:53:23.198884+00:00'
+  document:
+    title:
+    - 2301.11305.pdf
+  flagged: false
+  group: __world__
+  hidden: false
+  id: JoZDmp_DEe2QSbcSZI0WEA
+  links:
+    html: https://hypothes.is/a/JoZDmp_DEe2QSbcSZI0WEA
+    incontext: https://hyp.is/JoZDmp_DEe2QSbcSZI0WEA/arxiv.org/pdf/2301.11305.pdf
+    json: https://hypothes.is/api/annotations/JoZDmp_DEe2QSbcSZI0WEA
+  permissions:
+    admin:
+    - acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
+    delete:
+    - acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
+    read:
+    - group:__world__
+    update:
+    - acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
+  tags:
+  - chatgpt
+  - detecting gpt
+  target:
+  - selector:
+    - end: 27924
+      start: 27657
+      type: TextPositionSelector
+    - exact: We find that supervised detectors can provide similardetection performance
+        to DetectGPT on in-distribution datalike English news, but perform significantly
+        worse than zero-shot methods in the case of English scientific writing andfail
+        altogether for German writing. T
+      prefix: 'm each dataset for evalua-tion. '
+      suffix: his finding echoes pastwork show
+      type: TextQuoteSelector
+    source: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.11305.pdf
+  text: supervised detection methods fail on out of domain examples whereas detectgpt
+    seems to be robust to changes in domain.
+  updated: '2023-01-29T10:53:23.198884+00:00'
+  uri: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.11305.pdf
+  user: acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
+  user_info:
+    display_name: James Ravenscroft
+in-reply-to: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.11305.pdf
+tags:
+- chatgpt
+- detecting gpt
+- hypothesis
+type: annotation
+url: /annotations/2023/01/29/1674989603
+
+---
+
+
+
+ <blockquote>We find that supervised detectors can provide similardetection performance to DetectGPT on in-distribution datalike English news, but perform significantly worse than zero-shot methods in the case of English scientific writing andfail altogether for German writing. T</blockquote>supervised detection methods fail on out of domain examples whereas detectgpt seems to be robust to changes in domain.
\ No newline at end of file