From 7b0a650958ac2b416175089496ae1e38141d6de3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ravenscroftj Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 13:00:22 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add 'brainsteam/content/annotations/2022/11/27/1669553173.md' --- .../annotations/2022/11/27/1669553173.md | 60 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+) create mode 100644 brainsteam/content/annotations/2022/11/27/1669553173.md diff --git a/brainsteam/content/annotations/2022/11/27/1669553173.md b/brainsteam/content/annotations/2022/11/27/1669553173.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5144318 --- /dev/null +++ b/brainsteam/content/annotations/2022/11/27/1669553173.md @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ +--- +date: '2022-11-27T12:46:13' +hypothesis-meta: + created: '2022-11-27T12:46:13.123111+00:00' + document: + title: + - 'Mapping the impact: Exploring the payback of arthritis research' + flagged: false + group: __world__ + hidden: false + id: ebKibm5REe2ShxtULMIpFw + links: + html: https://hypothes.is/a/ebKibm5REe2ShxtULMIpFw + incontext: https://hyp.is/ebKibm5REe2ShxtULMIpFw/www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2009/RAND_MG862.pdf + json: https://hypothes.is/api/annotations/ebKibm5REe2ShxtULMIpFw + permissions: + admin: + - acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is + delete: + - acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is + read: + - group:__world__ + update: + - acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is + tags: + - scientometrics + - academic impact + target: + - selector: + - end: 46769 + start: 46609 + type: TextPositionSelector + - exact: Much broad and shallow evaluation is based onbibliometrics (examining + the quality of researchpublications) to assess the amount and quality ofknowledge + produced + prefix: ' from discovery to application).' + suffix: ". For example, David King\u2019sThe S" + type: TextQuoteSelector + source: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2009/RAND_MG862.pdf + text: here the authors are discussing the fact that a lot of analysis/evaluation + of research is done via bibliometrics (citation-based impact metrics) and they + consider this kind of evaluation to be "broad and shallow" + updated: '2022-11-27T12:46:13.123111+00:00' + uri: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2009/RAND_MG862.pdf + user: acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is + user_info: + display_name: James Ravenscroft +in-reply-to: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2009/RAND_MG862.pdf +tags: +- scientometrics +- academic impact +- hypothesis +type: annotation +url: /annotations/2022/11/27/1669553173 + +--- + + + +
Much broad and shallow evaluation is based onbibliometrics (examining the quality of researchpublications) to assess the amount and quality ofknowledge produced
here the authors are discussing the fact that a lot of analysis/evaluation of research is done via bibliometrics (citation-based impact metrics) and they consider this kind of evaluation to be "broad and shallow" \ No newline at end of file