diff --git a/brainsteam/content/annotations/2022/11/27/1669556048.md b/brainsteam/content/annotations/2022/11/27/1669556048.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..31de2cb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/brainsteam/content/annotations/2022/11/27/1669556048.md
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+---
+date: '2022-11-27T13:34:08'
+hypothesis-meta:
+  created: '2022-11-27T13:34:08.086172+00:00'
+  document:
+    title:
+    - OP-SCIP190035 895..905
+  flagged: false
+  group: __world__
+  hidden: false
+  id: K04A5G5YEe2Wv4uzp_WNKQ
+  links:
+    html: https://hypothes.is/a/K04A5G5YEe2Wv4uzp_WNKQ
+    incontext: https://hyp.is/K04A5G5YEe2Wv4uzp_WNKQ/viduketha.nsf.gov.lk:8585/FJDB_NSF/Science_and_Public_Policy/Vol.46(6)-2019/scz037.pdf
+    json: https://hypothes.is/api/annotations/K04A5G5YEe2Wv4uzp_WNKQ
+  permissions:
+    admin:
+    - acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
+    delete:
+    - acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
+    read:
+    - group:__world__
+    update:
+    - acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
+  tags:
+  - comprehensive impact
+  - researchers
+  target:
+  - selector:
+    - end: 3492
+      start: 3029
+      type: TextPositionSelector
+    - exact: ' increasing body of research analytically exploresthe consequences of
+        the research impact agenda on academic work,including the risks posed to research
+        quality (Chubb and Reed2018), prioritising of short-term impacts rather than
+        more concep-tual impacts (Greenhalgh and Fahy 2015; Meagher and Martin2017),
+        ethical risks (Smith and Stewart 2017), and a focus on indi-vidual academics
+        rather than on the broader context of research-based policy change (Dunlop
+        2018)'
+      prefix: ge production(Phillips 2010). An
+      suffix: .The sources of tension embedded
+      type: TextQuoteSelector
+    source: http://viduketha.nsf.gov.lk:8585/FJDB_NSF/Science_and_Public_Policy/Vol.46(6)-2019/scz037.pdf
+  text: Lots of papers write about the effect that the UK's focus on comprehensive
+    impact affects the quality of research and individual researchers
+  updated: '2022-11-27T13:34:08.086172+00:00'
+  uri: http://viduketha.nsf.gov.lk:8585/FJDB_NSF/Science_and_Public_Policy/Vol.46(6)-2019/scz037.pdf
+  user: acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
+  user_info:
+    display_name: James Ravenscroft
+in-reply-to: http://viduketha.nsf.gov.lk:8585/FJDB_NSF/Science_and_Public_Policy/Vol.46(6)-2019/scz037.pdf
+tags:
+- comprehensive impact
+- researchers
+- hypothesis
+type: annotation
+url: /annotations/2022/11/27/1669556048
+
+---
+
+
+
+ <blockquote> increasing body of research analytically exploresthe consequences of the research impact agenda on academic work,including the risks posed to research quality (Chubb and Reed2018), prioritising of short-term impacts rather than more concep-tual impacts (Greenhalgh and Fahy 2015; Meagher and Martin2017), ethical risks (Smith and Stewart 2017), and a focus on indi-vidual academics rather than on the broader context of research-based policy change (Dunlop 2018)</blockquote>Lots of papers write about the effect that the UK's focus on comprehensive impact affects the quality of research and individual researchers
\ No newline at end of file