---
date: '2022-11-27T13:34:08'
hypothesis-meta:
  created: '2022-11-27T13:34:08.086172+00:00'
  document:
    title:
    - OP-SCIP190035 895..905
  flagged: false
  group: __world__
  hidden: false
  id: K04A5G5YEe2Wv4uzp_WNKQ
  links:
    html: https://hypothes.is/a/K04A5G5YEe2Wv4uzp_WNKQ
    incontext: https://hyp.is/K04A5G5YEe2Wv4uzp_WNKQ/viduketha.nsf.gov.lk:8585/FJDB_NSF/Science_and_Public_Policy/Vol.46(6)-2019/scz037.pdf
    json: https://hypothes.is/api/annotations/K04A5G5YEe2Wv4uzp_WNKQ
  permissions:
    admin:
    - acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
    delete:
    - acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
    read:
    - group:__world__
    update:
    - acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
  tags:
  - comprehensive impact
  - researchers
  target:
  - selector:
    - end: 3492
      start: 3029
      type: TextPositionSelector
    - exact: ' increasing body of research analytically exploresthe consequences of
        the research impact agenda on academic work,including the risks posed to research
        quality (Chubb and Reed2018), prioritising of short-term impacts rather than
        more concep-tual impacts (Greenhalgh and Fahy 2015; Meagher and Martin2017),
        ethical risks (Smith and Stewart 2017), and a focus on indi-vidual academics
        rather than on the broader context of research-based policy change (Dunlop
        2018)'
      prefix: ge production(Phillips 2010). An
      suffix: .The sources of tension embedded
      type: TextQuoteSelector
    source: http://viduketha.nsf.gov.lk:8585/FJDB_NSF/Science_and_Public_Policy/Vol.46(6)-2019/scz037.pdf
  text: Lots of papers write about the effect that the UK's focus on comprehensive
    impact affects the quality of research and individual researchers
  updated: '2022-11-27T13:34:08.086172+00:00'
  uri: http://viduketha.nsf.gov.lk:8585/FJDB_NSF/Science_and_Public_Policy/Vol.46(6)-2019/scz037.pdf
  user: acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
  user_info:
    display_name: James Ravenscroft
in-reply-to: http://viduketha.nsf.gov.lk:8585/FJDB_NSF/Science_and_Public_Policy/Vol.46(6)-2019/scz037.pdf
tags:
- comprehensive impact
- researchers
- hypothesis
type: annotation
url: /annotations/2022/11/27/1669556048

---



 <blockquote> increasing body of research analytically exploresthe consequences of the research impact agenda on academic work,including the risks posed to research quality (Chubb and Reed2018), prioritising of short-term impacts rather than more concep-tual impacts (Greenhalgh and Fahy 2015; Meagher and Martin2017), ethical risks (Smith and Stewart 2017), and a focus on indi-vidual academics rather than on the broader context of research-based policy change (Dunlop 2018)</blockquote>Lots of papers write about the effect that the UK's focus on comprehensive impact affects the quality of research and individual researchers