ravenscroftj
/
brainsteam.co.uk
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
brainsteam.co.uk/brainsteam/content/annotations/2022/11/27/1669553173.md

2.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

date hypothesis-meta in-reply-to tags type url
2022-11-27T12:46:13
created document flagged group hidden id links permissions tags target text updated uri user user_info
2022-11-27T12:46:13.123111+00:00
title
Mapping the impact: Exploring the payback of arthritis research
false __world__ false ebKibm5REe2ShxtULMIpFw
html incontext json
https://hypothes.is/a/ebKibm5REe2ShxtULMIpFw https://hyp.is/ebKibm5REe2ShxtULMIpFw/www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2009/RAND_MG862.pdf https://hypothes.is/api/annotations/ebKibm5REe2ShxtULMIpFw
admin delete read update
acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
group:__world__
acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
scientometrics
academic impact
selector source
end start type
46769 46609 TextPositionSelector
exact prefix suffix type
Much broad and shallow evaluation is based onbibliometrics (examining the quality of researchpublications) to assess the amount and quality ofknowledge produced from discovery to application). . For example, David King’sThe S TextQuoteSelector
https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2009/RAND_MG862.pdf
here the authors are discussing the fact that a lot of analysis/evaluation of research is done via bibliometrics (citation-based impact metrics) and they consider this kind of evaluation to be "broad and shallow" 2022-11-27T12:46:13.123111+00:00 https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2009/RAND_MG862.pdf acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
display_name
James Ravenscroft
https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2009/RAND_MG862.pdf
scientometrics
academic impact
hypothesis
annotation /annotations/2022/11/27/1669553173
Much broad and shallow evaluation is based onbibliometrics (examining the quality of researchpublications) to assess the amount and quality ofknowledge produced
here the authors are discussing the fact that a lot of analysis/evaluation of research is done via bibliometrics (citation-based impact metrics) and they consider this kind of evaluation to be "broad and shallow"