ravenscroftj
/
brainsteam.co.uk
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
brainsteam.co.uk/brainsteam/content/annotations/2022/11/27/1669556048.md

2.8 KiB
Raw Blame History

date hypothesis-meta in-reply-to tags type url
2022-11-27T13:34:08
created document flagged group hidden id links permissions tags target text updated uri user user_info
2022-11-27T13:34:08.086172+00:00
title
OP-SCIP190035 895..905
false __world__ false K04A5G5YEe2Wv4uzp_WNKQ
html incontext json
https://hypothes.is/a/K04A5G5YEe2Wv4uzp_WNKQ https://hyp.is/K04A5G5YEe2Wv4uzp_WNKQ/viduketha.nsf.gov.lk:8585/FJDB_NSF/Science_and_Public_Policy/Vol.46(6)-2019/scz037.pdf https://hypothes.is/api/annotations/K04A5G5YEe2Wv4uzp_WNKQ
admin delete read update
acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
group:__world__
acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
comprehensive impact
researchers
selector source
end start type
3492 3029 TextPositionSelector
exact prefix suffix type
increasing body of research analytically exploresthe consequences of the research impact agenda on academic work,including the risks posed to research quality (Chubb and Reed2018), prioritising of short-term impacts rather than more concep-tual impacts (Greenhalgh and Fahy 2015; Meagher and Martin2017), ethical risks (Smith and Stewart 2017), and a focus on indi-vidual academics rather than on the broader context of research-based policy change (Dunlop 2018) ge production(Phillips 2010). An .The sources of tension embedded TextQuoteSelector
http://viduketha.nsf.gov.lk:8585/FJDB_NSF/Science_and_Public_Policy/Vol.46(6)-2019/scz037.pdf
Lots of papers write about the effect that the UK's focus on comprehensive impact affects the quality of research and individual researchers 2022-11-27T13:34:08.086172+00:00 http://viduketha.nsf.gov.lk:8585/FJDB_NSF/Science_and_Public_Policy/Vol.46(6)-2019/scz037.pdf acct:ravenscroftj@hypothes.is
display_name
James Ravenscroft
http://viduketha.nsf.gov.lk:8585/FJDB_NSF/Science_and_Public_Policy/Vol.46(6)-2019/scz037.pdf
comprehensive impact
researchers
hypothesis
annotation /annotations/2022/11/27/1669556048
increasing body of research analytically exploresthe consequences of the research impact agenda on academic work,including the risks posed to research quality (Chubb and Reed2018), prioritising of short-term impacts rather than more concep-tual impacts (Greenhalgh and Fahy 2015; Meagher and Martin2017), ethical risks (Smith and Stewart 2017), and a focus on indi-vidual academics rather than on the broader context of research-based policy change (Dunlop 2018)
Lots of papers write about the effect that the UK's focus on comprehensive impact affects the quality of research and individual researchers